We get questions from folks every now and then why we don’t use Journal Impact Factor to evaluate a particular article. We often retort that “there are good articles in low JIF journals, and bad articles in high JIF journals.” We can also discuss how retraction rates in high JIF journals are significantly higher than in low JIF journals. Read More
Today we announced adding the PlumTM Print to EBSCO Discovery ServiceTM (EDS) and EBSCOhost® databases. The Plum Print is a visualization of the altmetrics gathered for each research artifact. Read More
We recently announced a new kind of altmetric, a clinical citation. You can read more about it on this recent blog post. On May 26, 2016 we held a webinar diving into more detail about clinical impact and what Plum Analytics is doing with Clinical Citations. Read More
Plum Analytics Peeks into the Sci-Hub Top 100 Downloads By now I think everyone involved in performing research, publishing research, communicating research, and more is aware of what Sci-Hub is. If you are not, I highly recommend this Science Magazine article titled, Read More
From timeliness to self-citations, much has been written about why citation metrics are flawed — but that is not what this blog post is about. This blog post is about moving the conversation about citations forward to include clinical impact. Clinical research does not get cited as much as basic science. Read More
by Noella Natalino, Product and Content Manager, Plum Analytics This week I attended the FORCE11 Conference in my hometown of Portland, OR. Since then, I have been thinking about personal/professional evolution and story-telling, inspired by Cesar Hidalgo’s talk, Read More
(Update: we now have an audit log as referenced in question Q5 below. The audit log can be found here. This post and the audit log have been updated as of October 15, 2018.) We’ve enjoyed working with NISO on the NISO Altmetrics Initiative since it began in June of 2013. Read More
Finding new funding for research is critical for researchers and those who support them in order for their research to continue. Yet, they are often frustrated with the tools available to help them. The key is striking the right balance between casting a wide net and providing relevant opportunities that are suitable based on a researcher’s history and current research focus. Read More